In doing research for my Linguistics paper on the metaphors used to talk about blogs (wee!), I came across this really interesting article that none other than Berkeley’s own Markos Moulitsas Zuniga, the Kos of Daily Kos, wrote for The American Prospect about a year and a half ago. Kos reflects on the time he spent in the army right after high school, and why he switched from being a presinct-captain Republican to a card-carrying Democrat. It struck me as incredibly poignant, especially with an election nearing, as people are evaluating their own beliefs in choosing a candidate to vote for. It’s a short article, so you should definitely check it out!

P.S. How meta is it that in the midst of writing a paper about blogs, I should be compelled to post one of my own? Oh, academia.

So, my very favoritest Op-Ed writer has put a piece up on his blog on the tragically misunderstood racial legacy of the Gipper (so known for his “constant and exuberant gipping”, according to a reputable source). And I have to say, I think he’s really on to something. After all, not a few other prominent Republicans have made similar statements, even into the present day. And if these weren’t just innocent mistakes, what else are we to believe? That for decades one of the two dominant political parties in America has founded its success in large part on racist appeals of remarkable toxicity? Why, David Broder would get the vapors at the mere suggestion of it. No, that’s clearly ridiculous.

…Right?

A few days ago the President announced his intention to veto legislation which would expand health insurance coverage for children. By increasing federal funding for the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), this bill—hailed before as “popular” and “bipartisan”—would cover an additional 4 million children who are currently uninsured.

Today we learned that, inexplicably, over 150 Republicans in the House of Representatives went on the record against protecting the health of poor kids. Poor American kids. more »

…Is the title of the latest action-packed epic of heroism to emerge from the traveling circus of wingnuttia that is the Republican presidential primary. Go check it out.

And as a side note, I especially love how this spoofs the typical wingnut fantasy that each and every action they do or do not perform is a unique and beautiful example of American Heroism (TM).

From the Sept 25 1970 issue of the Washington Post, an excerpt from “The Post-Southern Strategy,” by Kevin Phillips:

The fulcrum of Republican appeal is more or less the “social issue”—law and order, permissiveness, campus anarchy, racial engineering. . . . The [Nixon] administration cannot build a lasting new GOP coalition until it can articulate a positive philosophy and program to replace liberalism’s failure to meet the needs of Middle America.

I’d say the GOP has done pretty well since then, capturing the South and the White House for the greater part of the last half century, the Congress since the nineties, and packing the Court with conservatives.

Last November’s midterm election was a clear repudiation against the GOP and President Bush; not a clear endorsement of the Democratic Party (in spite of our substantial gains and present majority in Congress).

We have a prime opportunity to discern ourselves from the GOP, not simply as their antithesis, but as a viable replacement that serves the needs of most Americans. Of course, the terms of Democratic party building today are different than those faced by Nixon. Still, what kind of “positive philosophy and program” does the Democratic Party have to replace conservatism’s failure?

And more importantly, how will it generate a lasting Democratic majority coalition?

Ann Coulter calls John Edwards a “faggot” at CPAC.

“I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go into rehab if you use the word ‘faggot,’ so I — so kind of an impasse, can’t really talk about Edwards.”

We already know she’s deranged, but her outstanding record of labeling Democrats as “fags” and “faggots” goes too far. I don’t know what’s worse: that her words are so violent and therefore are so denigrating the public discourse, or that Republicans and CPAC attendees are eating this shit up and loving it.

More here.

John McCain has officially declared his candidacy for President in the 2008 Election, and some have wondered whether “his age may be Mr McCain’s biggest handicap. If he won the presidency, he would by then—at 72—be the oldest man ever elected to the White House.”

I think it’s more likely that McCain’s unpopular stances on issues, especially his support of sending more troops to Iraq, would overshadow concerns about his age in the minds of voters. What do you think?