<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kos&#8217; Reflections on the Army &#38; Going Donkey</title>
	<link>http://caldems.com/blog/2007/11/20/kos-reflections-on-the-army-going-donkey/</link>
	<description>blog of the Cal Berkeley Democrats</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 22:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: thar</title>
		<link>http://caldems.com/blog/2007/11/20/kos-reflections-on-the-army-going-donkey/#comment-598</link>
		<author>thar</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 06:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://caldems.com/blog/2007/11/20/kos-reflections-on-the-army-going-donkey/#comment-598</guid>
					<description>I've noticed that &lt;i&gt;blog&lt;/i&gt; is used metonymically to refer to a blog entry (as you did in the last sentence) as well as the medium itself, much like &lt;i&gt;IM&lt;/i&gt; can refer either to the instant messaging capability or to a message sent using that capability, or how Gmail uses &lt;i&gt;chat&lt;/i&gt; in "X is offline and did not receive your chat." I suppose it's because there's no succinct term that means 'blog post' or 'blog entry', yet the medium is salient when discussing the entry.

I wonder if anyone has looked to see if there's as typical order to metonymic extensions of these sorts of terms. &lt;i&gt;Blog&lt;/i&gt; came from &lt;i&gt;web log&lt;/i&gt;, so it started as a noun referring to the medium; now it's also a verb and a part noun. &lt;i&gt;E-mail&lt;/i&gt; started out as the medium, and now is also a noun for an individual message. &lt;i&gt;Google&lt;/i&gt; started as a company, then became a service/medium, then a verb. Who knows: maybe in the future "a Google" will refer to a search result. Hey, maybe Ted Stevens was simply ahead of the curve when he said "My staff tried to send me an Internet the other day"...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that <i>blog</i> is used metonymically to refer to a blog entry (as you did in the last sentence) as well as the medium itself, much like <i>IM</i> can refer either to the instant messaging capability or to a message sent using that capability, or how Gmail uses <i>chat</i> in &#8220;X is offline and did not receive your chat.&#8221; I suppose it&#8217;s because there&#8217;s no succinct term that means &#8216;blog post&#8217; or &#8216;blog entry&#8217;, yet the medium is salient when discussing the entry.</p>
<p>I wonder if anyone has looked to see if there&#8217;s as typical order to metonymic extensions of these sorts of terms. <i>Blog</i> came from <i>web log</i>, so it started as a noun referring to the medium; now it&#8217;s also a verb and a part noun. <i>E-mail</i> started out as the medium, and now is also a noun for an individual message. <i>Google</i> started as a company, then became a service/medium, then a verb. Who knows: maybe in the future &#8220;a Google&#8221; will refer to a search result. Hey, maybe Ted Stevens was simply ahead of the curve when he said &#8220;My staff tried to send me an Internet the other day&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
